Leon Benson: sentenced to life in prison in 1999, for a crime he did not commit. We need some more attention to his case, and you can help by reaching out, spreading the word, listening to Leon’s story. Thank you for caring about the truth.
This is from the In These Times series The Prison Complex, by George Lavender
Jan. 30, 2014
When prisoners in the segregation unit at Westville Correctional Facility in Indiana received their lunch trays last Tuesday, it was, for some of them, a small taste of victory. While “savory stroganoff with noodles, mixed vegetables, and enriched bread” might not seem like much, the prisoners say it was their first hot weekday lunch in months, except on holidays. For the previous week, dozens in the unit had been protesting what they saw as inadequate food by refusing the cold sack lunches provided by the prison, according to two inmates who spoke to In These Times on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal from the prison.
“A lot of people didn’t believe that we could win,” says “Jela,” (not his real name), one of the prisoners involved in the protest. “We proved them wrong.”
Barring holidays, prisoners in the maximum security unit had been receiving sack lunches instead of the usual hot meal, five days a week for approximately seven months. Indiana Department of Corrections (DOC) Public Information Officer John Schrader says the switch to the sack lunch program was a response to requests from some prisoners, and was an effort to speed meal times and free up more time for recreation and showers.
But “people were losing weight, people were not getting the proper nutrients and calories,” charges “Malik,” another prisoner in the unit, who also asked to be identified by a pseudonym. Each bag contained slices of bread, peanut butter and jelly, and a cookie—“not enough,” according to Malik and Jela.
In response, say Jela and Malik, prisoners began making dozens of complaints about the program, which they say went unheeded. So more than 40 inmates took part in the protest, which was inspired by prisoner actions in California and Georgia, and organized by shouting between rec rooms.
This article comes from USAToday, Jan. 2nd 2013, written by: Tim Evans:
|Khalfani Malik Khaldun 042711|
May 20, 2010
The governor on Thursday downplayed a scathing federal report calling on Indiana to address widespread abuses within its juvenile correction facilities.
A Jan. 29 letter and report from U.S. Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez to Gov. Mitch Daniels details troubles within the former Indianapolis Juvenile Correctional Facility, including a mentally ill inmate left dirty and pulling out her hair and male guards having sex with and performing strip searches on young female inmates, 6News’ Joanna Massee reported.
The letter follows a civil rights investigation launched by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2008 that documented inadequate abuse investigations, excessive use of force and isolation, inadequate mental health care and inadequate special education services. The investigation into allegations of abuse began in 2004.
Daniels initially declined to comment on the report, but when asked about the issue at a jobs announcement on Thursday, he told Massee the report was “hopelessly out of date.”
“The problems there (the Indianapolis Juvenile Correctional Facility) — which were very severe and obviously needed attention — are many years old,” Daniels said. “They’re doing their job and tidying up what is really a six- or eight-year-old inquiry.
“When the report was originally released, Daniels volunteered to make improvements at all the facilities and to provide reports resulting from a partnership with the Indiana Juvenile Justice Task Force, an agency charged with monitoring the expected improvements.
The Indianapolis Juvenile Correctional Facility was closed in 2009, and female inmates were moved to the new Madison Juvenile Correctional Facility.
A statement from the Indiana Department of Correction called it “a much different facility than its predecessor in Indianapolis,” but a former employee told 6News that conditions for inmates worsened after the move.
“I do not think any child inside Madison Juvenile is safe,” the former employee, who did not want to be identified, told Massee.
6News was not allowed inside the Madison facility.
State Sen. Mike Delph, R-Carmel, who sits on the Senate Corrections Committee, said he is concerned about the allegations of abuse at the state’s juvenile correction facilities.
“When we have people in our custody, under our care, we have a responsibility and a duty, under our constitution, to take care of their wellbeing,” he said.
Delph said that the Department of Correction has not brought any issues involving juvenile justice to his attention. He said he has requested a meeting with the agency.
Correction Commissioner Edwin Buss declined requests to be interviewed.
Link to Article Here
Limit on prison visits angers South Bend family
By ALICIA GALLEGOS Tribune Staff Writer
May 23, 2010
SOUTH BEND — When Sam Dickens’ son went to prison earlier this year, the father didn’t think he’d have any problem visiting him at Westville Correctional facility.
After all, Dickens’ nephew is also an inmate in an Indiana prison, and Dickens has been visiting the young man for years.
But Dickens said he was shocked to learn he couldn’t be on his son’s visiting list.
Instead, new visiting restrictions at the Indiana Department of Correction meant Dickens had to choose to visit his son or his nephew, not both.
“I’m so frustrated. It’s just not right,” Dickens said during a recent interview at his home. “They’re separating the families.”IDOC officials explain the new visitation rule was implemented this year because of security concerns.
The restriction specifies extended family members and friends can visit only one IDOC inmate per six months. The rule, said IDOC spokesman Doug Garrison, is to curb rampant contraband trafficking plaguing Indiana prisons.
“We’re trying to reduce the chances of people bringing contraband into our facilities,” Garrison said.
Garrison says the new visitor restriction will help the IDOC better regulate who is coming into their facilities and who might be bringing prohibited items.The spokesman stressed the rule applies only to extended family members and does not affect fathers, mothers, children, sisters, brothers or grandparents.
But relatives such as Dickens and Tracy Franklin argue that many times it’s extended family members, such as aunts and uncles, who have helped raise children.
Franklin, of South Bend, has a son and nephew in Indiana prisons, along with a cousin. She only recently found out about the new restriction.
“I think family members should be able to see their loved ones,” she said. “That’s unfair. I can’t go see my nephew. I can’t go see my cousin.”
Dickens said his nephew, Greg Dickens, always looked up to him and that going to visit the man “empowers him,” and “kinda helps keep him alive.”Greg Dickens was convicted as a teenager of murder in the death of South Bend Police Cpl. Paul Deguch. He is now serving a life sentence.
Dickens’ son Samson Dickens just recently began serving a 6-year sentence for assault, his father said.
Garrison acknowledges the visiting policy will no doubt adversely affect families who are not at fault. But, he said the rising climate of contraband has forced correctional facilities to tighten their rules.
Take for instance one recent month, Garrison said, where IDOC officials confiscated 250 cell phones from one prison facility.”It’s absolutely crazy,” he said.
Indiana prisons are not alone.
In recent years, banned items — particularly cell phones — have steadily grown in prisons across the country, according to the American Correctional Association.
A visitor in a wheelchair sitting on hordes of cell phones. Civilians throwing tennis balls or footballs over prison yard fences with hidden items. Visitors slipping products inside sleeves.
“Inmates are creative,” ACA spokesman Eric Schultz said.Schultz said prisons are making various efforts to fight contraband, although he said he has not heard of other prisons restricting extended family members.
“That’s interesting,” he said of the IDOC rule. “I can’t say we have heard that.”
In Michigan, a similar visiting restriction is in effect, according to the MDOC website.
Proposed visitors can be on visiting lists for immediate family members, but only on the list of one prisoner who is not immediate family.
The rule indicates aunts, uncles or other family members can be included as “immediate family,” if they can provide verification they served as a surrogate parent.MDOC Spokesman John Cordell said he is not surprised about Indiana enforcing the new restriction.
“Unfortunately visitors are one of the ways contraband comes into prisons,” he said.
Visitors might not seem like that big a deal to those on the outside, but the Rev. David Link says for prisoners, they mean the world.
Link, former University of Notre Dame law school dean and now prison chaplain and deputy director of religious and community services for the IDOC, said inmates who have more family visits have a better attitude while in prison and are more likely to be successful upon release.”There’s not much that’s more important to the incarcerated than being able to visit with their families,” Link said. “It doesn’t just make them turn their life around, it makes them a better-acting prisoner.”
Link adds that non-family members — such as mentors, friends, or teachers — can often have an even greater impact on prisoners than an immediate family member. On the same note, an immediate family member can easily be the bad influence.
“We gotta look at it as a case-by-case basis,” Link said. “Someone has gotta look at who is best to visit and who might not be best to visit.”
Rather than a blanket limitation, Link believes, a better balance needs to be made between visiting benefits and maintaining security.
“We can’t let up on the security,” he said. “But we also gotta think of people as individuals.”As for the IDOC, Garrison said extended family members who would like to appeal the visiting restriction can always request an exception from the prison superintendent.
“I would encourage people to do that,” he said.
Dickens said he has made the difficult decision to visit his son in prison and not his nephew. He is considering appealing to the IDOC for an exception.
VOICES AGAINST INJUSTICE (via Facebook)
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Time: 6:00pm – 9:00pm
Location: Marion County Jail 2
Street: 730 E. Washington
City/Town: Indianapolis, IN
Every day that the NYSE is open for business, they trade stocks and bonds based on the population of privatized prisons. This is nothing less than modernized slavery with no regard for anymore for race (even though the statistics don’t lie that African-American Men represent 14% of the US Population, yet they account for 40% of the prison population). It would appear that the prime commodity for the booming business of the privatized prison industry would be the young black male.
Do you not see the similarity between the black and white stripes of the prison uniform and the UPC barcodes places on the goods we purchase in the stores? Human beings have been reduced to commodities. Prisoners are no longer humans, they are goods owned by each state to be traded. When I was a prisoner in Michigan, I was told I was no longer Heidi Marie Rogan… I was inmate #238631. I was no longer my own person, I was property of the State of Michigan. I was given a Class A ticket because I pierced my nose. The offense: damaging state property. My bunkie received a ticket because she fell asleep on the yard in the summer sun and received a sunburn over her body and needed medical treatment for it. Her offense: damaging state property. Rude awakenings. We were no longer humans. We were property. I worked at a landfill. I picked up garbage at a garbage dump for $1.85 a day. Not an hour. A day.
This is not even where the big money comes in though. Prisons around the United States are manufacturing products that some of you have in your own home. They are manufacturing clothing that some of you may be wearing on your body at this very moment. These prison factories are manufacturing clothing, pallets, furniture, cleaning supplies, and more. Ironically, the inmates manufacture the very steel doors that keep them locked inside the walls. They do all of this for way below minimum wage, receiving a daily wage rather than an hourly wage. Some states claim to have become “progressive” since they are now paying a minimum wage to their prisoners. I see this as a move made simply to appease the masses and shut the grumbling mouths of the enlightened up. At the risk of sounding like I am spewing forth rhetoric, this seems to be the move of the sharecropper.
On March 4th, 2010 Voices Against Injustice is standing against this insanity. Marion County Jail II is a privatized jail managed by CCA. We will be in front of this facility raising our artistic voices of intellect against this insanity. After a short informative speech, we will then move over to Urban Element. We have an ACLU attorney who is investigating the constitutionality of the permit laws within Marion County. A massive amount of Indianapolis’ vocal artists are coming out to support this cause including: Nsaychable, Souled Out, Gabby, Tony Styxx, Bashiri Asad, and more. Many performers will be coming from out of state as well, traveling from as far as Ohio and Mississippi. Due to the length of the ACLU’s battle with the city on this event, our keynote speaker’s will not be able to make until our event that will be held in June, which we are greatly looking forward to which will be discussed the night of the 4th.
Please plan to be there. We need many volunteers to help coordinate this massive front to fight this issue. If you have any questions about this, please send Heidi an email: sahabah2007 at gmail.com.